On
every forum remotely outdoors related, invariably, like clockwork,
someone shows up to ask about going off to live by themselves in the
woods. And, invariably the spectre of Dick Proenekke is brought up.
How awesome it would be to do what he did. One forum I go to has a
kid who I suspect isn’t entirely right in the head, who has asked a
question along these lines once every 4 months, for years.
I feel
compelled to shout that this is a romantic notion, not very well
grounded in reality. Mr. Proenneke was an exception. He was
exceptionally skilled in a whole host of areas, had worked towards
his goal for decades and saved, and had a support network in place.
He grew up on a hard scrabble depression era farm where he had to do
all the things he needed to do to survive. And I suspect he was also
a realist. Don’t get me wrong. I admire the man immensely, and look
enviously upon what he did. But I also grasp that I, with my life
experiences, would likely be at a disadvantage trying to emulate his
achievements. And I think that I am at an advantage compared to some
people I read blathering on about heading into the woods to do what
he did.
The early peoples who populated this planet, did it
because they worked together in groups. In nearly every tribe, for
time immemorial, they shared the workload as a community. The notion
of the lone wolf, the rugged individualist using his wits to survive
against nature, is just so much fanciful nonsense. Hunter-gatherers
lived as part of a tribal unit. They had a social support
network. People may have gone off to hunt or check the trap
lines or forage by themselves, but they had
a familial/tribal support network that was doing the
gathering, gardening, mending, sewing, tanning, tool making, etc.,
etc., etc. That’s why there was such an importance placed on having
lots of kids. More hands to do the necessary chores around camp.
Anyone that did live by themselves without benefit of that support,
was invariably someone who had been banished. It was essentially a
death sentence.
I
lived by my self for three years in an isolated hunt camp in northern
Ontario. It was the hardest thing I have ever done - bar none. I had
to fix structures, repair roads, prepare meals, bake bread, tend
gardens, look after animals, do laundry, mend things, can, cut trees,
chop wood, etc., etc., etc., etc. - pretty much entirely by
myself. It was absolutely
exhausting.
And I had people who came up to help me once every two weeks or so,
so I had some help at least. And I had running hot and cold water and electricity! Unless you have done this, alone, in
less than ideal conditions, with primitive tools, you have absolutely
no comprehension of how staggeringly difficult a task this is. Now
imagine that scenario if you are really sick or injured.
A
lot of the early mountain men dropped dead around forty or so. Not
from disease or starvation, but just from having worked themselves
into the ground. They were spent by middle age from the rigours of
trying to do it all themselves. Tending horses, hunting, drying meat,
fishing, running trap lines, gathering wood, building structures,
making, mending and washing clothes, etc., etc., - quite often by
themselves. While most of them worked in brigades, offering some form
of support, largely they were on their own for long stretches of time.
Sorry
to burst anyones bubble, but this is a delusional pipe dream
for the vast majority of people, that I know won’t end well. I have
absolutely no illusions at all as to the feasibility of living by
myself, far from anyone with no support network. And all those
prerequisite tasks require skills, mastered skills, not fumbling to
learn them along the way. I’ve been roaming around in the wilds for
30+ years. Hiking, camping, canoeing, hunting, practicing survival
skills. I think I’m reasonably fit, well equipped, and I think most
would consider me quite competent. But I don’t even remotely think
that trying to survive on my own is at all feasible.
I
thought there was a guy in Norway doing it. I had seen his blog a few
times. Looked him up. Whoops.
This
whole concept of “self-sufficiency” is one often touted in the
whole outdoorsy/survival/preparedness world. Sure, it’s admirable
and frankly fun to learn as many skills as possible, and becoming
really good at them even more so. Some people might look at me and
think it’s really something that I can make a lot of my own stuff.
It’s fun, and I’m proud of what I’ve created. But I have no
idea where I would be if someone else hadn’t made the fabric I had. I haven’t learned how to weave. Not that I don’t want to
learn, but time and cost prevent me from delving headlong into that
pursuit. So I am reliant on someone else for the material I need.
Thread. So simple, yet try making your own some time. Needles. I
would be screwed if I had to try and mine the metal, process it and
then try to create something as mundane, yet as complex as a needle.
Again, I am reliant on someone else’s expertise to help me do the
things I need and want to do. We are ultimately a social species,
reliant on the skills and resources that others have specialized in.
Each member of a society has a role to play. This was as true ten
thousand years ago as it is today. No one person can possibly hope to
do it all by themselves for very long.
And
this whole idea of living in the woods by one self really gets tipped
on its head when winter rolls in. The caloric requirements to survive
in winter, rise steeply over those in summer. Just to sit still in
camp would require between 3 to 8 pounds of meat a day, depending on
the species. If you didn’t have dozens of kids spending weeks and
months in good weather collecting fire wood, you had to/have to do it
yourself - in winter. Which burns calories. potentially thousands.
Which would require more meat. If you didn’t have time to hunt and
process enough meat to get you through the winter during the warm
months, you need to go hunting. Which means more burned calories,
which means even more meat. Having to process that kill
and transport it back to your camp burns even more calories, requiring yet more meat. You may
have to move camp to find game. Which burns even more calories. More meat.
Trying to survive for long in winter, alone, is a death sentence.
Before long the individual will go into a calorie deficiency. Sure,
you can burn body fat for a little while, but a hunting gathering
lifestyle works against storing much body fat. With a group to spread
out the work load, more food can be gathered and preserved, more
skins can be processed for warmth, more firewood can be gathered,
etc.
The
idea of anyone who has spent most of their life in a city, walking
off into the wilderness, alone, with everything they think they’ll
need on their back, with no definitive means of resupply, and most
importantly, if they have little to no experience......is fooling them-self.
You are absolutely right. I think we have incorrectly developed this notion that if we only learn enough skills, we can live in the woods alone. It's the whole "bushcraft lets you thrive in nature" phenomenon. There is a sacred set of skills that if acquired, you will be able to go into the woods and "thrive" with them. This is of course absurd, but it's hard to see when one is typing about it from their living room sofa.
ReplyDeleteFor most indigenous people being sent to live alone in the woods was either a test of manhood or a death sentence. For many of the trappers and woodsmen we look up to, running out of supplies was a serious emergency.
Skills are great, and they help. However, sometimes we get carried away with things we have not even come close to experiencing ourselves.